| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
http://www.robohornet.org gives a score of 101.36 on master,
and 102.68 with this PR. The latter is slightly better,
but probably within noise level.
So it looks like this PR does not affect DOM performance.
This is expected since `Box::new` is defined as:
```rust
impl<T> Box<T> {
#[inline(always)]
pub fn new(x: T) -> Box<T> {
box x
}
}
```
With inlining, it should compile to the same as box syntax.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In a later PR, DomRoot<T> will become a type alias of Root<Dom<T>>,
where Root<T> will be able to handle all the things that need to be
rooted that have a stable traceable address that doesn't move for the
whole lifetime of the root. Stay tuned.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
It can be retrieved through its init field.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The old specification URL is
https://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/spec/service_worker/ has
been replaced by the new one at https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/.
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Implement postMessage for ServiceWorkers
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Fixes #12773
r? @jdm
Changes:
* Implements `postMessage` on `ServiceWorker` object.
* Removes unused channels from sw and their scopes.
* Fixes a crash when calling `scope.script_chan()` in sw-scopes event handling.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix #12773
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes at `tests/html/service-worker`
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/12910)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Consistently use the name 'pipeline_id' to refer to a function that
returns an (optional) PipelineId.
This was prompted by discovering both fn pipeline and fn pipeline_id
doing the same job in htmliframeelement.rs.
Note that there is fn pipeline in components/compositing/compositor.rs,
but that actually returns an Option<&CompositionPipeline>, not any kind
of PipelineId.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
