| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Remove script_plugins
* Use crown instead of script_plugins
* crown_is_not_used
* Use crown in command base
* bootstrap crown
* tidy happy
* disable sccache
* Bring crown in tree
* Install crown from tree
* fix windows ci
* fix warning
* fix mac
libscript_plugins.dylib is not available anymore
* Update components/script/lib.rs
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
* Update for nightly-2023-03-18
Mostly just based off https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/30630
* Always install crown
it's slow only when there is new version
* Run crown test with `mach test-unit`
* Small fixups; better trace_in_no_trace tests
* Better doc
* crown in config.toml
* Fix tidy for real
* no sccache on rustc_wrapper
* document rustc overrides
* fixup of compiletest
* Make a few minor comment adjustments
* Fix a typo in python/servo/platform/base.py
Co-authored-by: Samson <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
* Proper test types
* Ignore tidy on crown/tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
* strict imports formatting
* Reformat all imports
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
http://www.robohornet.org gives a score of 101.36 on master,
and 102.68 with this PR. The latter is slightly better,
but probably within noise level.
So it looks like this PR does not affect DOM performance.
This is expected since `Box::new` is defined as:
```rust
impl<T> Box<T> {
#[inline(always)]
pub fn new(x: T) -> Box<T> {
box x
}
}
```
With inlining, it should compile to the same as box syntax.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In a later PR, DomRoot<T> will become a type alias of Root<Dom<T>>,
where Root<T> will be able to handle all the things that need to be
rooted that have a stable traceable address that doesn't move for the
whole lifetime of the root. Stay tuned.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I don't want to do such a gratuitous rename, but with all the other types
now having "Dom" as part of their name, and especially with "DomOnceCell",
I feel like the other cell type that we already have should also follow
the convention. That argument loses weight though when we realise there
is still DOMString and other things.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
