| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I moved away from the `Window` struct all the logic to handle task
sources, into a new struct called `TaskManager`. In a happy world, I'd
be able to just have there two functions, of the types:
```rust
fn task_source<T: TaskSource>(&self, name: TaskSourceName) -> Box<T>
fn task_source_with_canceller<T: TaskSource>(&self, name: TaskSourceName)
-> (Box<T>, TaskSourceCanceller)
```
And not so much duplicated code. However, because TaskSource can't be a
trait object (because it has generic type parameters), that's not
possible. Instead, I decided to reduce duplicated logic through macros.
For reasons[1], I have to pass both the name of the function with
canceller and the name of the function without, as I'm not able to
concatenate them in the macro itself. I could probably use
`concat_idents` to create both types already defined and reduce the
amount of arguments by one, but that macro is nightly only. At the same
time, not being able to declare macros inside `impl` forces me to pass
`self` as an argument.
All this makes this solution more verbose than it would be ideally. It
does reduce duplication, but it doesn't reduce the size of the file.
[1](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29599)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
http://www.robohornet.org gives a score of 101.36 on master,
and 102.68 with this PR. The latter is slightly better,
but probably within noise level.
So it looks like this PR does not affect DOM performance.
This is expected since `Box::new` is defined as:
```rust
impl<T> Box<T> {
#[inline(always)]
pub fn new(x: T) -> Box<T> {
box x
}
}
```
With inlining, it should compile to the same as box syntax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In a later PR, DomRoot<T> will become a type alias of Root<Dom<T>>,
where Root<T> will be able to handle all the things that need to be
rooted that have a stable traceable address that doesn't move for the
whole lifetime of the root. Stay tuned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I don't want to do such a gratuitous rename, but with all the other types
now having "Dom" as part of their name, and especially with "DomOnceCell",
I feel like the other cell type that we already have should also follow
the convention. That argument loses weight though when we realise there
is still DOMString and other things.
|
| |
|
|\ |
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This entirely removes the 'non-geckolib' feature of the util crate.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Given codegen now generates the various TypeId enums, it seems pointless to
still have to write their respective values in every DOM struct inheriting from
Node just to set the initial IS_IN_DOC flag in Document and IN_ENABLED_STATE in
form controls.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This merges import blocks that were reported by tidy as unmerged.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
closes #7357
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/6041
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|