aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/components/script/dom/bindings/codegen/run.py
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Port some code to Python3Vincent Ricard2021-02-181-2/+2
|
* Don’t rely on `$CARGO_TARGET_DIR` in build scriptsSimon Sapin2019-09-301-5/+5
|
* WebIDL codegen: Replace cmake with a single Python scriptSimon Sapin2019-09-271-0/+119
When playing around with Cargo’s new timing visualization: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/exploring-crate-graph-build-times-with-cargo-build-ztimings/10975/21 … I was surprised to see the `script` crate’s build script take 76 seconds. I did not expect WebIDL bindings generation to be *that* computationally intensive. It turns out almost all of this time is overhead. The build script uses CMake to generate bindings for each WebIDL file in parallel, but that causes a lot of work to be repeated 366 times: * Starting up a Python VM * Importing (parts of) the Python standard library * Importing ~16k lines of our Python code * Recompiling the latter to bytecode, since we used `python -B` to disable writing `.pyc` file * Deserializing with `cPickle` and recreating in memory the results of parsing all WebIDL files ---- This commit remove the use of CMake and cPickle for the `script` crate. Instead, all WebIDL bindings generation is done sequentially in a single Python process. This takes 2 to 3 seconds.