| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`layout` (#36613)
Now that legacy layout has been removed, the name `layout_2020` doesn't
make much sense any longer, also it's 2025 now for better or worse. The
split between the "layout thread" and "layout" also doesn't make as much
sense since layout doesn't run on it's own thread. There's a possibility
that it will in the future, but that should be something that the user
of the crate controls rather than layout iself.
This is part of the larger layout interface cleanup and optimization
that
@Looriool and I are doing.
Testing: Covered by existing tests as this is just code movement.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add memory reporter integration for the fragment and box trees that are
persisted in the layout thread.
Testing: Looked at the numbers for https://servo.org and
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/. The former was very small, but the latter
was 700mb.
---------
Signed-off-by: Josh Matthews <josh@joshmatthews.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#36312)
The `Constellation` previously held a `window_size` member, but this
assumes that all `WebView`s have the same size. This change removes that
assumption as well as making sure that all `WebView`s pass their size
and HiDIP scaling to the `Constellation` when they are created.
In addition
- `WindowSizeData` is renamed to `ViewportDetails`, as it was
holding more than just the size and it didn't necessarily correspond to
a "window." It's used for tracking viewport data, whether for an
`<iframe>` or the main `WebView` viewport.
- `ViewportDetails` is stored more consistently so that conceptually an
`<iframe>` can also have its own HiDPI scaling. This isn't something
we necessarily want, but it makes everything conceptually simpler.
The goal with this change is to work toward allowing per-`WebView` HiDPI
scaling and sizing. There are still some corresponding changes in the
compositor to make that happen, but they will in a subsequent change.
Testing: This is covered by existing tests. There should be no behavior
changes.
Fixes: This is part of #36232.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: rayguo17 <rayguo17@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Create `update_rendering` in `CanvasState` instead of manually updating in layout
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
* Mark as dirty and do flushes
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
* fixup rebase
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update components/script/dom/htmlcanvaselement.rs
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`Size::resolve_for_min()` had an `Au` parameter, representing the value
to be used for an automatic minimum size. However, this amount isn't
trivial to compute in flexbox, so this patch changes the parameter to a
function that can be called lazily.
Note flexbox isn't currently using `Size::resolve_for_min()`, but it
will in #35961.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When computing the intrinsic block size of a replaced element with a
computed preferred inline size of `auto`, instead of transferring the
final inline size through the aspect ratio, we were only transferring
the min and max constraints.
We did this to match other browsers, but Ian Kilpatrick agreed that this
is a bug and plans to change Blink.
CSSWG issue: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11236
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The CSSWG resolved that `block-size: stretch` on a block-level box
stretches the margin box to fill the parent. However, if the parent
doesn't have padding nor border, and doesn't establish an independent
formatting context, then we assume that the margins will collapse.
Therefore, we treat the margins as zero when resolving the stretch size,
regardless of whether they will actually end up collapsing.
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11044#issuecomment-2599101601
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-4/#stretch-fit-sizing
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Use 2024 style edition
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
* Reformat all code
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
---------
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were always treating an indefinite `stretch` as the automatic size.
This instead treats it as `0px` on min sizing properties, and as `none`
on max sizing properties, aligning with Blink and this recent CSSWG
resolution: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11006
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#35209)
A box is usually sized by the formatting context in which it participates.
However, tables have some special sizing behaviors that we implemented
with a `content_inline_size_for_table` override.
However, breaking the assumptions of the formatting context isn't great.
It was also bad for performance that we could try to layout a table
among floats even though it wouldn't en up fitting because of a larger
min-content size.
Therefore, this changes the logic so that formatting contexts use some
special sizing for tables, and then tables only override that amount
when there are collapsed columns. Eventually, we should try to remove
that case too, see https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11408
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of setting up a route for every image load in the DOM / Layout,
route all incoming image cache responses through the `ScriptThread`.
This avoids creating a set of file descriptor for every image that is
loaded.
This change requires having the `ImageCache` track the `PipelineId` of
the original the listener so that the `ScriptThread` can route it
properly to the correct `Window`.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If an absolutely position element which is replaced has `justify-self`
or `align-self` set to `stretch`, and no inset is `auto` on that axis,
then an automatic size should behave as `stretch`, not as `fit-content`.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some layouts like table need some style overrides. We were handling this
in `ComputedValuesExt`, but it was messy, unreliable and too limited.
For example, we were assuming that a style with `display: table` would
belong to a table wrapper box or table grid box. However, certain HTML
elements can ignore their `display` value and generate a different kind
of box. I think we aren't doing that yet, but we will need this.
Also, resolving the used border of a table needs layout information,
which we don't have in `ComputedValuesExt`. This patch will allow to
improve border collapsing in a follow-up.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There were two kinds of layout tracing controlled by the same debugging
option:
- modern layout: Functionality that dumped a JSON serialization of the
layout tree before and after layout.
- legacy layout: A scope based tracing that reported the process of
layout in a structured way.
I don't think anyone working on layout is using either of these two
features. For modern layout requiring data structure to implement
`serde` serialization is incredibly inconvenient and also generates a
lot of extra code.
We also have a more modern tracing functionality based on perfetto that
we have started to use for layout and IMO it's actually being used and
more robust.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It used to be an `AuOrAuto`, turning it into a `SizeConstraint` allows
passing the information about the min and max constraints when the
containing block doesn't have a definite block size.
This will be useful for table layout.
Note that in most cases we were already constructing the containing
block from a `SizeConstraint`, but we were calling `to_auto_or()` to
turn it into an `AuOrAuto`.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Push the interior mutability into enum variants of `Fragment`, so that
they can be cloned. This saves memory in the `Fragment` tree as the
`Fragment` enum is now a relatively wee 16 bytes and the interior parts
can be a variety of sizes. Before, every `Fragment` was the size of the
biggest kind (`BoxFragment` - 248 bytes).
This a step on the way toward incremental layout.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in each layout logic, in order to correctly resolve sizing keywords.
This patch adds a new `Sizes` struct which holds the preferred, min and
max sizing values for one axis, and unifies the logic to resolve the
final size into there.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Manage `<iframe>` size updates in `Window`. In addition to removing
duplicated code, this will allow setting `<iframe>` sizes synchronously
on child `Pipeline`s of the same origin in the script process in a
followup change. The goal is remove flakiness from `<iframe>` sizing.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Several structs and enums had a `inline_content_sizes()` method, but it
wasn't clear which ones would try to cache the result, and which ones
would always compute it.
Therefore, this performs some clarifying renaming:
- Cached ones stay as `inline_content_sizes()`
- Uncached ones become `compute_inline_content_sizes()`
Also, to simplify calls to `LayoutBoxBase::inline_content_sizes()`,
`compute_inline_content_sizes()` is moved into a new trait.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This might make caching these values a bit easier in the future.
Correcting the visibility of `ContainingBlock` also exposed some new
rustc and clippy warnings that are fixed here.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Consider this testcase:
```html
<canvas style="aspect-ratio: 1; height: stretch; background: cyan"
width="200" height="100"></canvas>
```
To compute the intrinsic inline sizes we were treating `height: stretch`
as the natural height (100px) and then transferring that to the inline
axis through the preferred aspect ratio. So the element was 100px wide.
However, an indefinite `stretch` should be treated as an automatic size,
which wouldn't be transferred to the inline axis.
The fix actually makes the code slightly simpler.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#34507)
Add a new struct `LayoutBoxBase`, that will be used throughout the box
tree. The idea of this struct is that we have a place to consistently
store common layout information (style and node information) and also to
cache layout results such as content sizes (inline and maybe later box
sizes) and eventually layout results.
In addition to the addition of this struct,
`IndependentFormattingContext` is flattened slightly so that it directly
holds the contents of both replaced and non-replaced elements.
This is only added to independent formatting contexts, but will later be
added to all block containers as well.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Refactor computation of preferred aspect ratios
Computing min/max-content sizes required a ContainingBlock in order to
resolve the padding and border when determining the preferred aspect
ratio. However, all callers already knew the padding and border, so they
can compute the ratio themselves, and pass it directly instead of
the ContainingBlock.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Put preferred aspect ratio into ConstraintSpace
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were using the preferred aspect ratio provided by the `aspect-ratio`
property instead of the natural aspect ratio. However, the preferred
aspect ratio should only be used to size the replaced element. To paint
the replaced contents into that element we need the natural ratio.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The min-content and max-content sizes on the block axis depend on the
inline size. But when computing the SizeConstraint corresponding to the
inline axis, we were resolving the preferred inline size ignoring
intrinsic keywords. Now we will only ignore `auto`.
Also, this patch refactors the logic to compute the min-content and
max-content block sizes after fully resolving the inline size.
This avoids having to resolve the inline sizing properties twice.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In most cases we already had a LazyCell anyways, since we could need the
value for multiple properties. Instead of passing a callback that forces
the evaluation of the LazyCell, it's simpler to just pass the LazyCell
directly.
Also, this way we no longer need mutable references.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#34152)
To compute the min-content and max-content inline sizes of a replaced
element, we were only using the aspect ratio to transfer definite block
sizes resulting from clamping the preferred block size between the min
and max block sizes.
However, if the preferred block size is indefinite, then we weren't
transfering the min and max through the aspect ratio.
This patch adds a `SizeConstraint` enum that can represent these cases,
and a `ConstraintSpace` struct analogous to `IndefiniteContainingBlock`
but with no inline size, and a `SizeConstraint` block size.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We only need the writing mode, not the entire computed style.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't need to floor the preferred box sizes to be at least zero,
since `used_size_as_if_inline_element_from_content_box_sizes()` will
take care of applying min and max constraints, and the min has been
floored to be at least zero.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The logic varied quite a bit depending on the case, now it's unified.
This also fixes the following case where the iframe was 150px tall
instead of 50px:
```html
<iframe style="min-width: 400px; max-height: 50px"></iframe>
```
This also modifies video-intrinsic-width-height.html to expect the new
behavior that we share with Blink and WebKit. In fact WebKit already
modified this test but forgot to export the change upstream. Firefox is
different but it was already failing anyways.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#34084)
Instead of falling back to zero.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A `<video>` element with no source won't have a natural aspect ratio,
but `aspect-ratio: auto` should still fall back to a ratio of 300/150.
`used_size_as_if_inline_element_from_content_box_sizes()` was already
handling this, but other consumers of `preferred_aspect_ratio()` were
wrong. In particular, this resulted in a 0px wide inline-block:
```html
<div style="display: inline-block; border: solid">
<video style="height: 100px; background: cyan"></video>
</div>
```
So this patch moves the fallback into `preferred_aspect_ratio()`.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were following CSS2, which didn't handle `aspect-ratio`.
This patch simplifies the logic and handles it correctly.
Unfortunately this makes 2 tests fail, but I'm pretty sure they aren't
spec-compliant. I'm leaving them as-is for now since they are part of
interop-2021, and Gecko, Blink and WebKit pass them (because of some
non-interoperable incorrect behaviors).
I'm adding a new test that is fully passed by Servo and WebKit.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* feat: patch for video layout sizes
added rebase from main 2024/10/05
Co-authored-by: Josh Matthews <josh@joshmatthews.net>
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* feat: take width and height parameters if provided
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* chore: tidy the code and update test expectations
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* feat: handle removing poster
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* chore: update test expectations and remove debug code
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* fix: issues after rebasing to main
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* feat: pass src remove test and tidy
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* chore: clippy fixes
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* chore: update passing test expectations
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* fix object-position-svg test
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* fix unintentional override of video size and resize events
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* change how resize events are sent to better match the spec
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* simplify poster mutation handling
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: eri <eri@inventati.org>
* improved handling of intrinsic sizes
- differentiate between natural size and css size
- presentational attributes
- fallback ratio for video element
- handle more cases where the src/poster are added/removed
- aspect ratio hints
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* update test expectations
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* fix cleaning current frame
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* update test expectations
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: eri <eri@inventati.org>
* More code review suggestions
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* Prevent aspect-ratio:auto from pulling the ratio from the default object size
As resolved in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7524#issuecomment-1204462924
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: eri <eri@inventati.org>
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Josh Matthews <josh@joshmatthews.net>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#34006)
Also, it was assuming that the aspect ratio would work with the content
box dimensions, but that isn't the case for `aspect-ratio: <ratio>` with
`box-sizing: border-box`.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the second flexbox caching change. It seeks to detect when a
relayout can be avoided in the case of a stretching flex item. This
heuristic can be combined, because currently we still do relayout
sometimes when we do not need to.
For instance currently we always relayout when a flex child is itself a
column flex. This only needs to happen when the grandchildren themselves
grow or shrink. That optimization is perhaps a lower priority as
`flex-grow: 0 / flex-shrink: 1` is the default behavior for flex.
Since this change means we more consistenly zero out the percentage part
of `calc` expressions when they have circular dependencies, this causes one
test to start failing (`/css/css-values/calc-min-height-block-1.html`).
This is related to w3c/csswg-drafts#10969, which is pending on further
discussion in the working group.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The result of `inline_content_sizes()` may depend on the block size of
the containing block, so we were always recomputing in case we got
a different block size.
However, if no content has a vertical percentage or stretches vertically,
then we don't need to recompute: the result will be the same anyways.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will allow callers to start obeying `min-content`, `max-content`,
`fit-content` and `stretch` in follow-up patches.
The old functionality is kept as deprecated methods that we should
eventually remove.
This patch has very little impact on the existing behavior, just some
very minimal implementation of the keywords for css tables.
This also overhauls fixed-layout-2.html since:
- It had code that wasn't doing anything
- It had wrong expecations in prose
- The logic seemed broken in general
- All browsers were failing one testcase
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of `HTMLCanvasDataSource::Image(None)` (#33519)
* `HTMLCanvasDataSource::Empty` that represent transparent black instead of Image(None)
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fix warning from 3a0d27b2312c6396e85178615290ac2ec3592ce1
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This also makes a couple small improvements:
- Rename `IntrinsicSizes` to `NaturalSizes` which reflects more
modern spec language.
- Move the conversion of Stylo's `ImageRendering` to WebRender's
version to a `ToWebRender` trait implementation.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change removes the `effective_writing_mode` concept and tries to
properly implement right-to-left layout support for all non-inline
writing modes. In general, what needs to happen is that rectangles
need to be converted to physical rectangles using the containing block.
A right-to-left rectangle's inline start is on the right physical side
of the containing block. Likewise a positive inline offset in
right-to-left text is a negative physical one.
The implementation here is pretty good for most layout modes, but floats
are still a bit in process. Currently, floats are processed in the
logical layout of the block container, but there still might be issues
with float interaction with mixed RTL and LTR.
While this does move us closer to supporting vertical writing modes,
this is still unsupported.
New failures:
- Vertical writing mode not supported:
- `/css/CSS2/floats/floats-placement-vertical-001b.xht`
- `/css/CSS2/floats/floats-placement-vertical-001c.xht`
- Absolutes inlines should avoid floats (#33323)
- `/css/css-position/position-absolute-dynamic-static-position-floats-004.html`
- No support for grid
- `/css/css-align/self-alignment/self-align-safe-unsafe-grid-003.html`
- `/css/css-position/static-position/inline-level-absolute-in-block-level-context-009.html`
- `/css/css-position/static-position/inline-level-absolute-in-block-level-context-010.html`
- Cannot reproduce these locally on any platform. Very mysterious:
- `/css/css-tables/row-group-margin-border-padding.html`
- `/css/css-tables/row-margin-border-padding.html`
- Exposes bugs we have related to hanging whitespace in preserved
whitespace inlines:
- `/css/css-text/white-space/trailing-space-and-text-alignment-rtl-003.html`
- `/css/css-text/white-space/white-space-pre-wrap-trailing-spaces-023.html`
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Rakhi Sharma <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Use app unit in `ComputedValuesExt`
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: atbrakhi <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
* Some miscellaneous fixes
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
* remove redundant defination of `containing_block_inline_size`
Signed-off-by: atbrakhi <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: atbrakhi <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In particular, this takes into account that flex items may be stretched,
and if they have an aspect ratio, we ma6y need to convert the stretched
size through the ratio.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When computing the automatic minimum size, flex layout was using the
natural aspect ratio, ignoring the `aspect-ratio` property.
`ReplacedContent::inline_size_over_block_size_intrinsic_ratio()` is now
made private to avoid more accidental uses.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were only handling the aspect ratio of a replaced element when
computing its min/max-content contribution, but not when computing
the min/max-content size. Now both cases will take it into account.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When computing the min-content or max-content size of an element we
need to ignore `inline-size`, `min-inline-size` and `max-inline-size`.
However, we should take the block-axis sizing properties into account.
That's because the contents could have percentages depending on them,
which can then affect their inline size via an aspect ratio.
Therefore, this patch adds `IndefiniteContainingBlock`, which is similar
to `ContainingBlock`, but it allows an indefinite inline-size. This
struct is then passed arround during intrinsic sizing.
More refinement will be needed in follow-up patches in order to fully
address the problem.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No change in behavior, it just simplies some code a little bit.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
|