Rename DOMRefCell<T> to DomRefCell<T>

I don't want to do such a gratuitous rename, but with all the other types
now having "Dom" as part of their name, and especially with "DomOnceCell",
I feel like the other cell type that we already have should also follow
the convention. That argument loses weight though when we realise there
is still DOMString and other things.

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/components/script_plugins/unrooted_must_root.rs b/components/script_plugins/unrooted_must_root.rs
index b0b409862c5..5b5647794dc 100644
--- a/components/script_plugins/unrooted_must_root.rs
+++ b/components/script_plugins/unrooted_must_root.rs
@@ -186,11 +186,11 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'tcx> visit::Visitor<'tcx> for FnDefVisitor<'a, 'b, 'tcx> {
             hir::ExprCast(ref subexpr, _) => require_rooted(cx, self.in_new_function, &*subexpr),
             // This catches assignments... the main point of this would be to catch mutable
             // references to `JS<T>`.
-            // FIXME: Enable this? Triggers on certain kinds of uses of DOMRefCell.
+            // FIXME: Enable this? Triggers on certain kinds of uses of DomRefCell.
             // hir::ExprAssign(_, ref rhs) => require_rooted(cx, self.in_new_function, &*rhs),
             // This catches calls; basically, this enforces the constraint that only constructors
             // can call other constructors.
-            // FIXME: Enable this? Currently triggers with constructs involving DOMRefCell, and
+            // FIXME: Enable this? Currently triggers with constructs involving DomRefCell, and
             // constructs like Vec<JS<T>> and RootedVec<JS<T>>.
             // hir::ExprCall(..) if !self.in_new_function => {
             //     require_rooted(cx, self.in_new_function, expr);