Auto merge of #7468 - JoshTheGoldfish:Issue7460, r=jdm

Making test-tidy check that = have space after them

For issue #7460. Need to ensure compatibility with #7390.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7468)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->

5 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/components/layout/block.rs b/components/layout/block.rs
index d697cad97a9..79e73a482f8 100644
--- a/components/layout/block.rs
+++ b/components/layout/block.rs
@@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ pub struct BlockFlow {
 
 bitflags! {
     flags BlockFlowFlags: u8 {
-        #[doc="If this is set, then this block flow is the root flow."]
+        #[doc = "If this is set, then this block flow is the root flow."]
         const IS_ROOT = 0x01,
     }
 }
diff --git a/components/layout/data.rs b/components/layout/data.rs
index 4b551e2fd9e..097852096fa 100644
--- a/components/layout/data.rs
+++ b/components/layout/data.rs
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ impl PrivateLayoutData {
 
 bitflags! {
     flags LayoutDataFlags: u8 {
-        #[doc="Whether a flow has been newly constructed."]
+        #[doc = "Whether a flow has been newly constructed."]
         const HAS_NEWLY_CONSTRUCTED_FLOW = 0x01
     }
 }
diff --git a/components/layout/fragment.rs b/components/layout/fragment.rs
index 02af5569d84..749a3cf5660 100644
--- a/components/layout/fragment.rs
+++ b/components/layout/fragment.rs
@@ -2300,10 +2300,10 @@ bitflags! {
     // Various flags we can use when splitting fragments. See
     // `calculate_split_position_using_breaking_strategy()`.
     flags SplitOptions: u8 {
-        #[doc="True if this is the first fragment on the line."]
+        #[doc = "True if this is the first fragment on the line."]
         const STARTS_LINE = 0x01,
-        #[doc="True if we should attempt to split at character boundaries if this split fails. \
-               This is used to implement `overflow-wrap: break-word`."]
+        #[doc = "True if we should attempt to split at character boundaries if this split fails. \
+                 This is used to implement `overflow-wrap: break-word`."]
         const RETRY_AT_CHARACTER_BOUNDARIES = 0x02,
     }
 }
diff --git a/components/layout/incremental.rs b/components/layout/incremental.rs
index 623fa4685fe..14205b32cb5 100644
--- a/components/layout/incremental.rs
+++ b/components/layout/incremental.rs
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ bitflags! {
 
 bitflags! {
     flags SpecialRestyleDamage: u8 {
-        #[doc="If this flag is set, we need to reflow the entire document. This is more or less a \
-               temporary hack to deal with cases that we don't handle incrementally yet."]
+        #[doc = "If this flag is set, we need to reflow the entire document. This is more or less a \
+                 temporary hack to deal with cases that we don't handle incrementally yet."]
         const REFLOW_ENTIRE_DOCUMENT = 0x01,
     }
 }
diff --git a/components/layout/inline.rs b/components/layout/inline.rs
index 4b5a6b985c7..4202b6b9d16 100644
--- a/components/layout/inline.rs
+++ b/components/layout/inline.rs
@@ -183,9 +183,9 @@ int_range_index! {
 
 bitflags! {
     flags InlineReflowFlags: u8 {
-        #[doc="The `white-space: nowrap` property from CSS 2.1 § 16.6 is in effect."]
+        #[doc = "The `white-space: nowrap` property from CSS 2.1 § 16.6 is in effect."]
         const NO_WRAP_INLINE_REFLOW_FLAG = 0x01,
-        #[doc="The `white-space: pre` property from CSS 2.1 § 16.6 is in effect."]
+        #[doc = "The `white-space: pre` property from CSS 2.1 § 16.6 is in effect."]
         const WRAP_ON_NEWLINE_INLINE_REFLOW_FLAG = 0x02
     }
 }